CEHD News Sarah Jergenson

CEHD News Sarah Jergenson

Hansen-Burke: Talking kindergarten anxiety with U of M

Summer is winding down and — for many new kindergartners and their parents — first-time school anxiety may be starting to set in. Parents might wonder if their kid will make new friends, like their teacher or learn to read.

Annie Hansen-Burke, Ph.D., a senior lecturer in the College of Education and Human Development, addresses questions many parents have about helping their kids get through that critical first year of school.

Q: What are some of the most common concerns you hear from parents of new kindergarteners?
Dr. Hansen-Burke: 
For many parents this is the first time they’re sending their children into the hands of another caregiver, so the question of whether they can trust the school to care for their kindergartener is a big one. In other cases, there’s the worry of whether their child is ready for the full day of academic work and how they will adjust to a new setting. 

Q: How should parents prepare themselves for the transition to having a school age child?
Dr. Hansen-Burke: 
First, it’s important to acknowledge that this is a normative transition that families go through. While transitions are a normal part of life, they often bring challenges. As a parent of recent kindergarten graduates, I can testify to the fact that this milestone can be emotional and requires some adjustment. Planning for the logistics of the school year can help to settle parents’ nerves.

Once you know how your child will get to and from school, set up any before and after school care they may need. Learning about school calendars and supplies may make you feel more comfortable with the transition. Also, keep in mind that parents are important models for children. Communicating that school is a positive, important part of your child’s life will help to ease your child’s transition and connection to school as well.

It can be reassuring to remember that — although you may only go through this transition once or a few times — your child’s teacher has likely navigated the kindergarten transition many times and knows how to support their new students. 

Q: How can parents prepare their kids to have a smooth first day?
Dr. Hansen-Burke: 
Similar to parents’ own preparation, it will help kids to know what to expect. If you are able to attend a meet-the-teacher night, your child will have a chance to see their new classroom and meet classmates for the first time. Visiting the school will help to make it a familiar place that will be more comfortable for both of you. Going over the routine with your child can also help. This may take the form of talking with your child about how they’ll get to school, when you will reunite with them at the end of the day and what kinds of things they’ll learn about.

As many of us experience, summer time pushes back bedtime and disrupts our routines, so re-establishing earlier bedtimes and daily routines a week or so before school can help your child (and you!) get into the routine of the school year. A publication by the National Association of School Psychologists on this topic also recommends clearing your schedule from extra commitments during the first week, so that you have the time and energy to support your child’s transitions. 

Q: How can parents support kindergarteners throughout their first year of school?
Dr. Hansen-Burke: 
Parents can support their kindergarteners by continuing to talk about school and learning at home, modeling and reinforcing that school is a positive part of their child’s life. In addition, maintaining stable routines — such as a family dinner — can help smooth out the bumps that transition may introduce to your family life.

You may look for opportunities to be involved in your child’s school or learning, but keep in mind that parent involvement can take many forms. You may have the interest and time to volunteer in the classroom or join a committee, but that is not the only way to stay connected. You can also be involved by talking about what they learned at school, reading aloud with them and asking questions about their day. It is most likely that this will be a relatively smooth and successful start to your child’s school experience. However, if you have concerns about your child’s adjustment or progress, remember that there are professionals at school who can help. This includes your child’s teacher, school psychologists, school counselors and school social workers. 

Q: How is the University of Minnesota training school psychologists to help kids and parents in Minnesota cope with school-related anxiety?
Dr. Hansen-Burke: 
Our school psychology students have the opportunity to learn about school-wide practices that support positive social-emotional development and mental health in the classroom and in our partner schools across the state. They take a course on social, emotional and behavioral interventions, learn how to engage with families, and have the opportunity to work and train in the field to see how schools support students. We encourage our students, many of whom become school psychologists in the state of Minnesota, to use resources such as the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP). It provides a variety of resources on topics such as back-to-school transitions. Finally, we have faculty right here in the state of Minnesota who conduct research to understand how schools can better support students with anxiety and other mental health issues.

Annie Hansen-Burke, Ph.D., is a senior lecturer in the College of Education and Human Development at the University of Minnesota. Dr. Hansen-Burke works in the Department of Educational Psychology’s school psychology program where she trains future school psychologists to work with teachers, parents and other school staff. Her goal: to ensure school psychology students have the skills they need to help all students succeed in their academic, social, emotional and behavioral lives.

                                                               ###

About “Talking…with U of M”
“Talking…with U of M” is a resource whereby University of Minnesota faculty answer questions on current and other topics of general interest. Feel free to republish this content. If would like to schedule an interview with the faculty member or have topics you’d like the University of Minnesota to explore for future “Talking…with U of M,” please contact University Public Relations at unews@umn.edu.

CSPP student selected as Totino-Grace’s 2019-20 counseling intern

Darian Winslow

Darian Winslow, MA student in the counseling and student personnel psychology program, was recently chosen as Totino-Grace’s (TG) counseling intern for the 2019-20 school year.

Winslow is a 2013 graduate from TG herself and received her BS in human development and psychology from North Dakota State University in Fargo, ND. Additionally, Winslow is the head cross country coach at TG and is an assistant coach for track and field.

Winslow’s counseling philosophy is student-centered and solution focused. She emphasizes the importance of creating authentic relationships with students in order to help them succeed in all aspects of life. She is passionate about helping build better humans, advocating for all students, and embracing each individual’s unique characteristics.

Congratulations on this achievement, Darian!

McComas hosts international webinar on RETT Syndrome and telehealth

Professor Jennifer McComas

Jennifer McComas, professor in the special education program in the Department of Educational Psychology, presented a Rett UK webinar, “Addressing Complex Communication Needs of Individuals with Rett Syndrome via Telehealth” on Thursday, September 5 to speech-language pathologists and special educators in the Netherlands and UK. The presentation was followed by a panel discussion.

During the webinar, McComas described the telehealth-based process she and her team have used to teach augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to more than 15 participants with Rett syndrome. In addition, she shared case examples of various formal communication modes (e.g., microswitches operated with hands, eye pointing at picture cards, and eye-gaze activated speech-generating computer systems) addressed via telehealth.

Ohrtman: Talking kids and social media with U of M

Marguerite Ohrtman head shot
Marguerite Ohrtman

With the start of a new school year right around the corner, many parents may be asking themselves if their kids spent too much time online this summer. But is all social media use bad?

Marguerite Ohrtman, assistant teaching professor in the counseling and student personnel psychology program, answers questions about kids’ social media use and what parents can do to promote positive experiences online.

Read more

Butterfuss recognized with APA dissertation award

Reese Butterfuss, a doctoral candidate in the psychological foundations of education program, received the 2019 Division 15 Dissertation Research Grant Award from the American Psychological Association (APA). The award includes a $1,000 stipend to support his dissertation research. The award was announced at the APA Conference in Chicago.

Butterfuss’s dissertation examines knowledge revision processes and outcomes when learners engage with multiple sources that conflict with their prior knowledge. His adviser is professor and Guy Bond Chair in Reading, Panayiota (Pani) Kendeou. Find out about other work in Kendeou’s lab by visiting the Reading + Language Lab webpage.

Kendeou named Incoming Editor of Journal of Educational Psychology

Panayiota Kendeou

Panayiota (Pani) Kendeou, PhD, Guy Bond Chair in Reading and professor in the Department of Educational Psychology is the Incoming Editor of the Journal of Educational Psychology. As the leading outlet for high-quality empirical research in the field of educational psychology, the Journal of Educational Psychology has a stellar reputation. According to the American Psychological Association (APA), the journal ranks third among psychology-education publications and has an impact factor (frequency of citations of average journal article) of 5.178. Its 5-year factor (number of times articles published in the past five years have been cited in journal citation report year) is 6.290.

Kendeou and her team will begin handling review of new manuscripts as incoming editor on January 1, 2020. Her term as editor-in-chief will begin on January 1, 2021. 

For more information on Kendeou’s bio and research, visit her Reading + Learning Lab site.

Vukovic receives ‘Thank a Teacher’ note from student

Rose Vukovic

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI), Thank a Teacher program allows students to provide unsolicited feedback by sending thank you notes to teachers who make a positive difference in their education and personal development. Rose Vukovic, associate professor in the Department of Educational Psychology’s special education program, recently received one of these “thank a teacher” notes which showcases the lasting impact she has on her students.

The note reads:

“I just wanted to thank you for such a unique class experience. Even though it was a small group, it was clear that you genuinely cared for us and wanted us to succeed. I will always remember your class and all of the great advice you gave us, both related to our studies and life in general. Thank you!!”

-Student in EPSY 3303 – Educational Psychology Undergraduate Practicum

Have you had a teacher that has made a difference in your education? Visit CEI’s website to thank them.

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI) Thank a Teacher Program allows students to provide unsolicited recognition by sending thank you notes to professors who make a positive difference in their achievement and development.

Skovholt receives APA Lifetime Achievement Award

Thomas Skovholt

Thomas Skovholt, emeritus professor in the counseling and student personnel psychology (CSPP) program, was recently awarded the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 17 Lifetime Achievement Award. According to the APA, Professor Skovholt is being recognized for his many years of international collaborations and contributions to counseling psychology. As a faculty member, he mentored and advised CSPP students from Korea, Germany, Taiwan, Bolivia, Japan, Turkey, Kuwait, and China.

Professor Skovholt will receive his award at the APA Division 17 International Scholars Welcome Breakfast on August 8 in Chicago, Illinois.

Congratulations to Professor Skovholt on this tremendous honor!

Hansen-Burke receives ‘Thank a Teacher’ note from student

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI), Thank a Teacher program allows students to provide unsolicited feedback by sending thank you notes to teachers who make a positive difference in their education and personal development. Annie Hansen-Burke, senior lecturer in the Department of Educational Psychology’s school psychology program, recently received one of these “thank a teacher” notes which showcases the positive learning environment that she creates for her students.

The note reads:

“Thank you for making my graduate school experience enjoyable, enlightening, and empowering. Your calm and positive support has allowed me to push my limits and learn more about schools, systems, other people, and myself. You are truly a light, and your stories and advice will continue to help me grow into the future, personally and professionally.”

-Student in Hansen-Burke’s class

Have you had a teacher that has made a difference in your education? Visit CEI’s website to thank them.

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI) Thank a Teacher Program allows students to provide unsolicited recognition by sending thank you notes to professors who make a positive difference in their achievement and development.

Reading + Learning Lab presents six times at ST&D

Six projects associated with the Reading + Learning Lab were presented at the Society for Text & Discourse (ST&D) Annual Conference in New York City which occurred July 9-11.

The Society for Text and Discourse is an international society of researchers who investigate all aspects of discourse processing and text analysis.

The purpose of the Society is to consolidate research in discourse processing and to enhance communication among researchers in different disciplines. A second objective of the society is to contribute to the education and professional development of those in the field or entering the field.

The presentations—focused on knowledge revision and reading/language comprehension—are listed below:

*Aubele, J., *Butterfuss, R., *Harsch, R., & Kendeou, P. (2019, July). Epistemic dimensions of language and their influence on trust and belief of information. Poster presented at the Society for Text & Discourse Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

*Bresina, B. C., *Kim, J., McMaster, K. L., & Kendeou P. (2019, July). Learning from video texts: The relation between text cohesion and reader comprehension skill. Poster presented at the Society for Text & Discourse Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

*Butterfuss, R., *Aubele, J. D., *Morara, G., *Zaccoletti, S., Mason, L., & Kendeou, P. (2019, July). How do source credibility and justification for knowing influence knowledge revision on social media? Poster presented at the Society for Text & Discourse Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

*Butterfuss, R., *Kim, J., *Aubele, J. D., *Bresina, B., *Harsch, R., McMaster, K., & Kendeou, P. (2019, July). The promise of a Technology-Based Early Language Comprehension Intervention (TELCI) for students with comprehension difficulties. Poster presented at the Society for Text & Discourse Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

*Harsch, R., & Kendeou, P. (2019, July). Analogical reasoning as a catalyst for knowledge revision. Poster presented at the Society for Text & Discourse Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

*Kim, J., *Butterfuss, R., *Harsch, R., *Aubele, J., & Kendeou, P. (2019, July). When misconceptions strike back: The durability of the refutation text effect. Paper presented at the Society for Text & Discourse Annual Meeting, New York, NY.

* denotes student co-author

About the Reading + Learning Lab

The Reading + Learning Lab is led by Panayiota (Pani) Kendeou, Guy Bond Chair in Reading and Professor in the Department of Educational psychology. The lab examines the relationship between language and memory, with an emphasis on understanding and improving learning during reading. The lab also develops and applies technology-based interventions and assessments.

Q&A with school psych PhD student Mollie Weeks

We interviewed Mollie Weeks, a fourth-year PhD student in the Department of Educational Psychology’s school psychology program about her interests in the field and what brought her to the Department of Educational Psychology.

What are your research interests?

“My personal research interests focus on the promotion of evidence-based practices to improve educational disparities across general and special education for traditionally marginalized youth as well as the subsequent policy and legislative changes that help promote educational equity.”

How did your path lead to the Department of Educational Psychology and your particular major?

“Ever since learning what graduate school was, I aspired to seek an education beyond my undergraduate degree. However upon graduation, I did not know exactly which field I wanted to pursue. My problem was that the fields of which I was familiar (e.g., clinical and counseling, developmental psychology, neuroscience, IO, etc.) seemed too narrow for my broad interests and career ambitions. Rather than applying to graduate school during my senior year of college, I accepted a position in my alma mater’s admission office and began a three-year stint as an admissions officer and then an assistant dean of admissions. Over those three years, I learned first-hand the very real barriers students experience in the pursuit of education. As a result, I became more and more passionate about issues of educational equity, access, opportunity, and mental health. During my search for a fulfilling graduate program, I began reading about the field of school psychology and came to the realization that it fit my interests perfectly. With a degree in school psychology, I would be able to combine my passion for education and the field of psychology into one area of study. I began reading some of the academic literature of various scholars in the field (and browsing websites of many graduate programs). I became convinced that the University of Minnesota would provide me a solid foundation to succeed in both research and practice, and I submitted an application. Although I had developed extensive knowledge about the college admissions process during my day job, I wasn’t prepared for the anxiety that would come from submitting my own application. I felt a renewed appreciation for the bravery of the students with whom I worked. Thankfully, the faculty decided that I was a good fit for the program and admitted me. That is how I came to the Department of Educational Psychology.”

What surprised you along the way?

“After taking time off between my undergraduate and graduate pursuits I was very nervous to re-enter the world of academia and felt the full weight of imposter’s syndrome even prior to the start of classes. A large part of me worried that I was not smart enough for graduate school and that I had forgotten how to actually be a student during my time off. I was incredibly relieved when I started my program and realized that there were many people with similar career trajectories as myself and that most students shared my concerns. One of the most surprising aspects of graduate school was the emphasis on mastery learning which differed greatly from my undergraduate experience. As opposed to writing a paper and submitting it for credit, there were ample opportunities to learn about your mistakes and make corrections. The logic of this is clear- in graduate school you are trained to perform a task in practice which means that you need to know what you are doing. This does not happen overnight and without errors. The emphasis on mastery learning was one of the greatest supports in helping me overcome anxiety about succeeding as a graduate student.”

What is something you’ve most enjoyed about your experience?

“I have really enjoyed the variety of my graduate experiences and feel that this variability is the reason why graduate school has been one of the most interesting periods of my life. I love that some days I am tasked with reading a lot of literature, other days I am in class, and other days I am practicing in the field—applying what I have read and learned to my practice. One of the reasons I initially struggled to find the right psychology career to pursue was the narrow scope of research and practice that seems to characterize other disciplines (at least from an outsider’s perspective). Although chaotic at times, the ability to have a multifaceted graduate experience has been extremely enjoyable and is one of my favorite aspects of graduate school.”

What is most exciting about your work?

“I find the cycle of learning new knowledge about my field then subsequently contributing new knowledge to be the most exciting aspect of my work. I find so much joy in reading new research or attending conferences in which I leave with a sense that school psychology is a meaningful pursuit and can result in the betterment of education for all students. Although I find myself struggling with manuscript writing or statistics sometimes, the moment when I realize that I have something meaningful to contribute to the field is exhilarating. That feeling overshadows the self-doubt I also experience and propels me to learn more.”

How would you describe the student experience and what does that mean to you?

“For me, the student experience is characterized by the steady transition from learner to independent scholar and practitioner. My early years of graduate school were fairly prescriptive in terms of what I worked on, when I worked on it, and what classes I enrolled. Over time, a transition took place within the student experience in which I had more influence over how I spent my time, which projects I accepted, and the educational/professional experiences I pursued. It was exciting to pass program milestones and feel a tangible shift from student to scholar.”

What has been most challenging?

“Finding the right balance between being a student, scholar, family member, friend, and individual person has been the most challenging aspect of graduate school. Unlike my time in undergrad (where there were services and amenities that shielded students to some of the realities of adulthood), graduate school is a time in which you are expected to function as a student in the real world which involves cooking, cleaning, paying bills, navigating insurance, repairing your apartment, scheduling vet appointments, and—of course—being a present and active family member and friend. It can be hard to prioritize each role, and my success at balancing them has waxed and waned throughout the past three years. Although I feel that this year (my third year) was my most successful year of finding balance, there were still periods of time when some of my other responsibilities fell by the wayside because school work needed to be completed.

One of the greatest challenges I think that we face as a field, however, is helping schools shift from reactive approaches of service delivery to proactive and preventative. All school systems want to see their students flourish but may not know how to use data to efficiently manage resources and proactively provide supports. For years, the field has been seen as the gatekeepers of special education services which has severely limited our ability to implement school-based prevention initiatives. The focus on data-based decision-making and prevention was one of the greatest draws of the program here at the University of Minnesota. From curriculum to practice, faculty promote material that will allow us to work with systems to enact positive change and move towards proactive prevention.”

How have your professors helped you along the way?

Throughout my time in graduate school, support from professors has been expansive. Not only are they very friendly and approachable, but they take time to help me really understand the material, push my critical thinking, and serve as professional role models. Although I sometimes perceive them to be larger-than-life scholars, I have come to understand that they too shared similar graduate school experiences and insecurities which they have shared in an effort to help me throughout the program. They provide guidance when I need it, but also encourage me to develop my interests and competencies independent of their direct guidance. I have left many meetings with a renewed sense of calm after speaking to professors about my concerns or questions.”

What would you like prospective students to know?

“One aspect of graduate school I have struggled with the most—and something I advise all prospective and current students not to do—is comparing my journey through graduate school with those of my peers. Each student enters graduate school with different interests and priorities and will take different pathways of reaching them—that is not only okay but expected. The most important thing is to participate in research or practice opportunities that align with your priorities and career interests. It is absolutely fine to say no to opportunities that do not help you get to where you want to be or are misaligned with your research and practice goals (even if you think students should be doing those things). You cannot do everything everyone else is doing, and accepting that reality will ease some of the stress of graduate school.

How has your cohort helped you along the way?

“The support, kindness, and—at times—mutual stress of my cohort was one of the most significant factors in the success I have experienced in graduate school. Each graduate cohort is different, and I am incredibly grateful that my cohort is filled with people who want to see each other grow and succeed. Prior to entering graduate school, I heard horror stories about the competitive nature of pursuing a PhD and am extremely grateful that those stories have not defined my graduate experience. Rather, my cohort worked together during classes and fieldwork to help make sure that people were successful and able to balance their myriad priorities. My cohort offered support to one another so many times which, I think, has made all the difference in our perspective of graduate school.”

What are you looking forward to with graduation?

“The one aspect of graduation I am most looking forward to is also the aspect of which I am most nervous. Specifically, I look forward to the independence that my career trajectory should afford me. When talking to faculty, many have stated that they enjoy the independence of their position and the ability to choose for themselves which projects to prioritize and what to study next. That level of independence is very different from what I have experienced in other jobs and seems refreshing. However since I have not experienced that level of independence, it is also a bit intimidating.”

How do you plan to use what you are learning/your degree?

“I hope to use my degree to enter into academia and conduct original research while training the next generations of school psychologists. More importantly, I hope that my future work is used in practice or policy to improve education for all students and help create more equitable environments for all learners.”

Ed Psych welcomes new chair

Kristen McMaster

Kristen McMaster, Stern Family Professor of Reading Success, became chair of the Department of Educational Psychology (Ed Psych) in July. McMaster earned her PhD in special education from Vanderbilt University and came to the department in 2002 as a lecturer in the special education program. She moved to a tenure track position one year later and has called the department her academic home ever since. 

McMaster says her experiences in Ed Psych have helped her to “grow as a scholar and contributed to the joy and satisfaction she finds in her work.” And as chair, she is looking to pay it forward. McMaster envisions a department where faculty, staff, and students find fulfillment and meaning in their work each day.

“It is a place where the excellent research, teaching, and mentorship that happens every day is evident in the spaces we occupy and in all the things that we do,” she says.

A leader in the field of special education, McMaster researches ways to improve how academically diverse students—including those at-risk for and with disabilities and students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds—respond to interventions. She currently serves as principal investigator or co-principal investigator on three federally funded research grants. And in recent years, McMaster gained valuable leadership experience overseeing undergraduate, graduate, licensure, and certificate programs as special education program coordinator.

Kendeou, colleagues awarded new IES grant to study reading comprehension

Panayiota Kendeou

Panayiota Kendeou, Guy Bond Chair in Reading Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology’s psychological foundations of education program, is part of a team of researchers who were recently awarded a four-year, $1.4 million grant, funded through the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The project, “iSTART-Early: Interactive Strategy Training for Active Reading and Thinking for Young Developing Readers,” aims to develop and test an intelligent tutoring system that provides automated reading comprehension support to students in grade 3 and 4. The team is led by Dr. Danielle McNamara, professor at Arizona State University and includes Kendeou and Carol Connor at University of California-Irvine as co-principal investigators.

For more information on Kendeou’s research, visit her Reading + Learning Lab site.

Rios receives ‘Thank a Teacher’ note from student

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI), Thank a Teacher program allows students to provide unsolicited feedback by sending thank you notes to teachers who make a positive difference in their education and personal development.

Joseph Rios, assistant professor in the Department of Educational Psychology’s quantitative methods in education program recently received one of these “thank a teacher” notes which showcases the impact he has on his students and passion for what he teaches.

The note reads:

“THANK YOU for sharing your wealth of knowledge about educational measurement with us last semester. Your clear enthusiasm for the content and authentic interest in helping us to think critically about the history, development and use of psychological assessments will carry us well into our future work. Additionally, I’d like to recognize the fact that you were able to do all of this your first semester on campus. Thank you for whatever late nights and days of work you put into making our experience meaningful and fruitful. U of M students are lucky to have you on campus!”

Have you had a teacher that has made a difference in your education? Visit CEI’s website to thank them.

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI) Thank a Teacher Program allows students to provide unsolicited recognition by sending thank you notes to professors who make a positive difference in their achievement and development.

Sullivan quoted in Star Tribune on equity in technology access

Amanda Sullivan head shot
Amanda Sullivan

Amanda Sullivan, Birkmaier Education Leadership Professor in the Department of Educational Psychology’s school psychology program, was recently quoted in the Star Tribune article, “Underserved Minneapolis youths get job skills at Best Buy Teen Tech Center.”

Sullivan—who researches education disparities among students from diverse backgrounds—explained to the Star Tribune why access to technology in schools is crucial to student success.

“A lot of people have these pictures in their heads of schools being very wired and that students are using tablets and new technologies in their classrooms, but it’s not the reality for a lot of students,” Sullivan said. “Career and employment options are changing, so this kind of access is critical to learning, engagement and advancement of individuals and communities.”

Read the full article.

Berger receives ‘Thank a Teacher’ note from student

Carolyn Berger

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI), Thank a Teacher program allows students to provide unsolicited feedback by sending thank you notes to teachers who make a positive difference in their education and personal development. Carolyn Berger, assistant professor in the Department of Educational Psychology’s counseling and student personnel psychology program, recently received one of these “thank a teacher” notes which showcases the impact she has on her students and the positive environment she creates in her classroom.

The note reads:

“Thank you so much for all that you’ve done for myself and my cohort over the last two years. It has been such an incredible experience getting to be in your classes, and we greatly appreciate all of your tutelage. Your impact goes far beyond teaching as well. Thank you for taking the time to get to know all of us one on one and helping shape us into the best counselors we can be. Hearing about your experiences as a school counselor has given me great insight into what the role entails, and I love hearing the different aspects that you have personally experienced. Thank you for everything, Dr. Berger. Your passion and dedication does not go unnoticed!”

-MA student in counseling and student personnel psychology

Have you had a teacher that has made a difference in your education? Visit CEI’s website to thank them.

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI) Thank a Teacher Program allows students to provide unsolicited recognition by sending thank you notes to professors who make a positive difference in their achievement and development.

Loch receives ‘Thank a Teacher’ note from student

Suzanne Loch head shot
Suzanne Loch

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI), Thank a Teacher program allows students to provide unsolicited feedback by sending thank you notes to teachers who make a positive difference in their education and personal development.

Suzanne Loch, senior teaching specialist in the Department of Educational Psychology’s quantitative methods in education program, recently received one of these “thank a teacher” notes which showcases the impact she has on her students and the positive environment she creates in her classroom.

The note reads:

“I really appreciated your teaching style and the set up of your course. I learned so much and cultivated a love for statistics that I did not have before. I had so much fun participating in discussions and completing the assignments. I would take this course again and will be recommending it to others!”

-Student in Suzanne Loch’s online section of EPSY 3264: Basic and Applied Statistics

Have you had a teacher that has made a difference in your education? Visit CEI’s website to thank them.

The Center for Education Innovation’s (CEI) Thank a Teacher Program allows students to provide unsolicited recognition by sending thank you notes to professors who make a positive difference in their achievement and development.

Sullivan briefs congress on harmful effects of exclusionary discipline practices

Amanda Sullivan head shot
Amanda Sullivan

Amanda Sullivan, associate professor and program coordinator in the Department of Educational Psychology’s school psychology program, was the lead psychologist on a congressional briefing entitled, “Exclusionary Discipline at the Intersections of Disability Identity, Race, and Gender,” on June 12.

At the briefing, Sullivan—who was joined by professor Ivory Tolsdon from Howard University—explained the psychological consequences of higher expulsion rates among marginalized student groups. Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR), chair of the House Education and Labor Subcommittee on Civil Rights and Human Services, expressed her commitment to using congressional oversight of the Department of Education to ensure discipline policies do not discriminate against racial and ethnic-minority students, students with disabilities or other vulnerable student populations.

The briefing was sponsored by the American Psychological Association and Rep. Bonamici. The event was attended by over 60 congressional staffers and representatives of the National Academy of Sciences and various professional groups and associations from in the capitol.

Psych foundations student honored with WPLC leadership award

Christina Zdawczyk accepts her Women’s Philanthropic Leadership Circle award from Jean Quam, dean of the College of Education and Human Development (left), and Geoffrey Maruyama, chair of the Department of Educational Psychology (right).
Photo: Julie Michener

Christina Zdawczyk, a PhD student in the Department of Educational Psychology’s psychological foundations of education program, was recently honored by the College of Education and Human Development (CEHD) Women’s Philanthropic Leadership Circle (WPLC) with a Graduate Student Award.

Zdawczyk—whose faculty adviser is associate professor Keisha Varma—accepted her award during a ceremony held at the University of Minnesota Alumni Center on June 11. At the event, she explained what drives her to “learn better ways to teach science” and gave a heartfelt thank you to the WPLC with the following remarks:

Hello everyone, and thank you so much for coming together today, in part to honor those of us who were selected to receive recognition by the Women’s Philanthropic Leadership Circle this year.

Ever since I was in first grade and a boy told me I can’t do math because I’m a girl, I’ve been compelled to prove every person who’s thought less of girls, wrong. This manifested in my summers at a summer program taking genetics and cryptology in male-dominated classrooms. It pushed me into leadership positions that—while uncomfortable at first—I grew into. And eventually, it fostered a greater sense of security regarding my own abilities, as well as a desire to turn around and help other girls who didn’t or don’t have the strong positive support systems that helped me along the way.

This is how I ended up at the U. Driven by a conversation with a precocious girl who was taking computer science at the same summer program I had attended 10 years prior (and where I worked as staff during summers as an undergraduate) and hearing her same sense of isolation and imposter syndrome that I had felt years before, I saw a responsibility to make sure that subsequent decades saw greater improvement than the years that separated us. No girl, no woman, should feel responsible for the stereotypes that threaten them and compel them to undermine their own intelligence or self-worth. My master’s research focused on strategies for creating computer science classes with environments that promote girls’ sense of belonging and interest, without deterring others. My current work as an NSF fellow at the Smithsonian Science Education Center focuses on scaffolding teachers’ understanding of how to create inclusive environments for students—including girls, English language learners, students with disabilities, and students of various races, ethnicities, and backgrounds. And my dissertation research is focusing on understanding how to help science teachers—many of those I’ve worked with who have been women—learn better ways to teach science.

It is this last endeavor that will be so largely supported by the WPLC graduate student award. With this award, I will be able to better strengthen my measures and understanding of science teacher conceptions and self-beliefs as they enter professional development, through repaying participating teachers for their time and help in piloting my surveys and helping me create rigorous scales for better measurement. These same teachers have tirelessly worked with us on other endeavors to test educative materials for us, and I’m so grateful for the opportunity to repay their kindness. This award will also allow me to include a qualitative component to my dissertation study, by granting me access to necessary programs to analyze these teachers’ open-ended responses to questions about their scientific understanding. Lastly, the remaining award money will help me in what will hopefully be my last year as a graduate student, at an essential time as my NSF fellowship funding comes to an end.
My whole life has been driven by a desire to push against the tide keeping girls and women out of STEM and STEM education; even now, as I try to continue to expand this scope from myself, to girls, to women, I’m still constantly filled with an immense sense of fraud and imposter syndrome myself. It was incredibly easy to feel as though I didn’t deserve this award and that I don’t belong among such accomplished graduate students. And the prospect of meeting all of you genuinely inspiring, strong, kind, philanthropic women and men was frightening, because I was worried you might discover my flaws.

But a greater part of me knew that I was just reverting back to those hardwired insecurities—the ones keeping those girls, and those women, and yet again, myself, from pursing things I want and causing me to attribute this recognition to chance. As it says on the Women’s Philanthropic Leadership Circle website landing page, “Your life doesn’t get better by chance, it gets better by change.”

Thank you for inspiring me to reflect on my thoughts about chance, and for providing me with such change, not only through the funding to help both others and myself as I continue on with my graduate studies, but more importantly, for recognizing my history and my research. You have reminded me once again of these obstacles women face, even internally, even when being celebrated and recognized.

I cannot stress the significance and gratitude I feel of receiving this award from a women’s leadership group after years on this path. And I can’t think of a greater honor than to be recognized by the women and men who have supported and led the progress of women’s advancement. I’m humbled, and I cannot wait to reciprocate your kindness through continuing to try to change the lives of others.

Thank you.